I'm not sure what you mean. The site seems to rate DC pretty well--a helluva lot better than I would rank this cesspool of a city.
No. High numbers = bad. The city did terribly.
I didn't realize there were only 25 cities total in the count. But it's still better in several categories than I would rank it. Look how well the hated Metro did.
We ranked pretty low for "attractiveness." That kinda hurts.
Ranked 25th in "fun people".....I think that's an understatement!
but we're #1 for historic sites and monuments!!you don't say...and those fanny pack wearers from kansas think you and i are pretty "worldly."
You guys just saw this?? This survey has been out for weeks and weeks, FYI.*filler*
DC sucks worse than this survey actually says.
If they had changed "People Watching" to "People Mocking" I think DC would have scored a lot higher.
I'm not sure what you mean. The site seems to rate DC pretty well--a helluva lot better than I would rank this cesspool of a city.
ReplyDeleteNo. High numbers = bad. The city did terribly.
ReplyDeleteI didn't realize there were only 25 cities total in the count. But it's still better in several categories than I would rank it. Look how well the hated Metro did.
ReplyDeleteWe ranked pretty low for "attractiveness." That kinda hurts.
ReplyDeleteRanked 25th in "fun people".....I think that's an understatement!
ReplyDeletebut we're #1 for historic sites and monuments!!
ReplyDeleteyou don't say...
and those fanny pack wearers from kansas think you and i are pretty "worldly."
You guys just saw this?? This survey has been out for weeks and weeks, FYI.
ReplyDelete*filler*
DC sucks worse than this survey actually says.
ReplyDeleteIf they had changed "People Watching" to "People Mocking" I think DC would have scored a lot higher.
ReplyDelete