10.23.2007

Read It and Weep

It's not just me. It's everyone.

I guess I should point out that high numbers are bad. The scale goes from one (the best) to 25.

9 comments:

  1. I'm not sure what you mean. The site seems to rate DC pretty well--a helluva lot better than I would rank this cesspool of a city.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No. High numbers = bad. The city did terribly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I didn't realize there were only 25 cities total in the count. But it's still better in several categories than I would rank it. Look how well the hated Metro did.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We ranked pretty low for "attractiveness." That kinda hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ranked 25th in "fun people".....I think that's an understatement!

    ReplyDelete
  6. but we're #1 for historic sites and monuments!!
    you don't say...

    and those fanny pack wearers from kansas think you and i are pretty "worldly."

    ReplyDelete
  7. You guys just saw this?? This survey has been out for weeks and weeks, FYI.

    *filler*

    ReplyDelete
  8. DC sucks worse than this survey actually says.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If they had changed "People Watching" to "People Mocking" I think DC would have scored a lot higher.

    ReplyDelete