4.23.2007

Vulnerability is Rewarded with Brain Damage and/or Death

My archives are down so I can't tell you when I said this, but I remember the gist of it pretty vividly. "Any city can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable citizens." I wrote that in response to the city bureaucracy's tendency to kill off the mentally retarded and then cover it up with oodles of red tape. Reading the Post on my lunch break, I noticed that things have not improved.

First there's this absolutely heartbreaking story in the Metro section that deals with a baby, Rafael Pearson, trying be adopted by his grandmother. In the time it took for the adoption to be finalized, the interim foster mother beat the kid literally senseless.

Today, he is 19 months old. He has doughy cheeks, carefree curls and a sweet spot for anyone who'll rub his back.

He also is profoundly disabled. He cannot see. He cannot walk or talk. He cannot hold his head up. He has the mind of a child of two or three months. He is likely to develop cerebral palsy. He lives in a Dunn Loring nursing home for disabled children.

The systematic abuse at the hands of the foster mother could have been prevented, or, at the very least, stopped before things got this out of hand. Unfortunately, this kid fell through the rather wide cracks in the city's social services policies.

After Rafael was placed with [foster mother] Jenkins, his social worker returned once during the six weeks the baby was in the home. Under court-ordered rules, a social worker must visit weekly during the first eight weeks a child is with a new foster family.

The social worker made her only visit to Rafael on Oct. 3, according to [Child and Family Services spokeswoman Mindy] Good. No one from the child welfare agency would see Rafael again until it was too late.

Of fucking course. I hope heads roll for this. It's not like DC has a history with this kind of monumental fuck-up.

Advocates had sued the District in 1989, saying the city's child welfare system was a wreck. The Washington Post later reviewed cases from 1993 through 2000 and documented the D.C. government's role in the neglect and deaths of 229 children placed in protective care.

In 1995, the child welfare system was placed in court receivership. It stayed there until 2001. But its efforts, catalogued in voluminous reports by a federal court monitor, have been slow in many areas.

Holy Hell. 229 children! I honest-to-God can not wrap my head around this. Two hundred twenty-fucking-nine children dead due to DC neglect. I am so happy that Rafael's grandmother is going to sue the bejesus out of DC. One would think that this sort of lawsuit, bad publicity, and 229 dead children would be enough to start turning things around. But if history is any indication, I doubt it.

...

...


Oh, but there's more! Today's editorial page featured a scathing rebuke of DC's treatment towards its most vulnerable citizens.

A 39-YEAR-OLD mentally ill man dies after a perfect storm of failures at St. Elizabeths Hospital. A 32-year-old woman with bipolar disorder who had never received a required mental assessment hangs herself in the D.C. Jail. Meanwhile, a judge determines that 650 people with mental disabilities are suffering because of the "wholly inadequate" job performed by the D.C. government.

...The St. Elizabeths patient, Mark Harris, died of cardiopulmonary arrest when he became violent and a counselor restrained him. The Jan. 9 death has been ruled a homicide. An investigation showed a series of things gone wrong: no other staff available or willing to help; one oxygen tank locked in a closet that no one had a key to; another oxygen tank not working; and no defibrillator. The counselor used a form of restraint now deemed dangerous.

The story of Alicia Edwards, as told by the Legal Times, is equally chilling. Awaiting trial in the D.C. Jail for shoplifting, the woman was flagged as having mental health problems. The required in-depth exam was never done, and she hanged herself while alone in a cell March 31. Also troubling is that jail officials initially released false information about how she was being monitored.

How anyone can call themselves proud to be from or live in DC is beyond me. What an absolute disgrace. There is a long list of people who should be ashamed of themselves for the blood on their hands.

33 comments:

  1. This is why we don't deserve a vote.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Blast and Damnation! Suing is too good for these people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually our most vulnerable members of society are the unborn. But in the name of "choice" we have been aborting tens of millions of them.

    These stories about the appaling treatment of children in DC are just one more example of how our nation has lost its respect for human life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wait a minute...there's a list? A long one? Who's on it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This place is hell.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. Pro Life ever think that some of those kids that are aborted MIGHT wind up on that list of foster care abuse and mentally ill because they were unwanted....get raped while addicted to crack and have AIDS and see how you feel about abortion...fucker.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Agree that all of the examples you give are very sad (downright depressing, actually). But it'd be an even more compelling arguement if you posted some comparable stats on other places, no?

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is appalling. It seems that you hear stories like this from all across the country. Is it because government in general sucks at providing these services? Is there a better answer? I sure hope so. Has anyone come up with one?

    ReplyDelete
  9. And here's something else to ponder: if character is (in any way, shape, or form) determined by the company you keep, what does that mean for DC citizens at large?

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is awful but it's not just in DC where this is a problem. It's everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Boston is Philly for ugly people.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mr. Pro Choice ever think that maybe the actual problem is our general apathy and lack of respect for life? The symptoms of the problem are unwanted and abused children. But they are only the tragic illustration of much bigger problems.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am down with an abortion debate as long as people keep it civil...and that means you commenter #6. No attacking my commenters just because you disagree.

    I don't think comparing DC's problems to other cities is reasonable. One, it's a lot of work and I don't feel like it. Two, surely we all agree that 229 dead children is unacceptable regardless of what is going in New York, Boston, Philly, etc.

    I'm still willing to bet that DC's problems greatly eclipse the other cities.

    ~Rusty

    ReplyDelete
  14. Just don't be braindead, Rusty, and you'll be just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's super easy to be pro-life and talk about unborn babies if you are a man. When men carry babies they don't want for nine months and compromise their lifestyle and health for them, then maybe they could start talking.

    ReplyDelete
  16. We should be focusing on DC's record of total fuck-uppery, but, Girl, no. No, no, no. Your vagina does not give you a monopoly on the abortion debate.

    Abortion is neither here nor there. Everyone can agree that the city should be doing a better job of protecting children in its custody.

    ~Rusty

    ReplyDelete
  17. It's not my vagina that gives me that right, it's the fact that we have to carry a baby/parasite inside for 9 months that cannot survive without us. The baby does not NEED a man to survive past conception.

    ReplyDelete
  18. As a former member of the fetus-American community, I'd like to express gratitude to my hostess for letting me hang around until I could breathe, poop, eat and scream all on my own.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Big yes to people who say this problem is nationwide. I've heard some horrifying from all over. and Yes DC is fucked up. I think that if bureaucrats weren't running the child welfare system we'd have less of this. I'm not sure a solution. but bringing the choice debate into this is just partisan politics...let's stick to protecting the kids that are already here and let others fight that losing battle elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Oh and tell a rape victim that is pregnant (almost 20% of cases since rapist tend to not use condoms) that CHOICE isn't about HER vagina....

    ReplyDelete
  21. Rusty, I think you should reconsider. I don't think women have a monopoly on the debate, but we certainly have the final -- and frankly, more authoritative -- word. Can you imagine if a bunch of women were in charge of men's health...

    Wait... We'd probably do a good job.

    Women and their bodies in this country, and many others, are hostages to men. Even if you agree with me (or any other woman) 100 percent, your opinion will be valued differently because it's coming from an XY. You will never know what it is to carry a fetus, or to have to make the choice to no longer carry that fetus. While we appreciate your voice, Girl is right. It is super easy for men to be pro-life and talk about unborn babies. Everything changes when you have a womb.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Oh and tell a rape victim that is pregnant (almost 20% of cases since rapist tend to not use condoms) that CHOICE isn't about HER vagina...."

    I am going to demand you back that statistic up considering how wacky rape statistics and abortion statistics are.

    And it's also super easy for a woman to be anti-choice. I agree that the choice has to fall to the woman, but that doesn't mean the opinion of anti-choice men should be disregarded. For many women and men, human life as early as conception is sacrosanct and I don't think that merely being a pro-choice woman is a fair way to refute that.

    I consider myself quite pro-choice and I could spend an hour talking about how ridiculous the Supreme Court decision to ban D&X abortions was. I just want people to be as polite as possible to an opposing viewpoint. I don't think that archdukefranz was getting that courtesy.

    ~Rusty

    ReplyDelete
  23. When do we get to see your promised rant about your roomie getting a j-walking ticket?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I don't agree that Achdukefranz has been mistreated. it is him who brought in the abortion debate to this unrelated topic by saying:

    "Actually our most vulnerable members of society are the unborn. But in the name of "choice" we have been aborting tens of millions of them"

    Acutally, unborn children ARE NOT the most vulnerable members, as 90 % or more make it out of the womb just fine. It is clear that in DC, an unborn child has a much better odds of surviving than a kid in the foster care system. Half or more of our homeless population was in the systm at some point in their lives, and we can see how far that got them.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "I don't think comparing DC's problems to other cities is reasonable. One, it's a lot of work and I don't feel like it. Two, surely we all agree that 229 dead children is unacceptable regardless of what is going in New York, Boston, Philly, etc."

    Rusty, that's weak.

    229 dead children is absolutely appalling, but to disregard the national problem and focus instead on our social and cultural ills being purely a function of social services breakdowns in Washington’s municipal government is lazy and shortsighted. Why do you ask how anyone can be proud to be from D.C.? Why don’t you instead ask how anyone can be proud to be an American?

    Because then you and the blessed and utopian citizens of the Boston suburbs have to be accountable, too, wouldn’t you? Typical transplant logic.

    What exactly are you doing to help the situation? Because your blog might serve a higher purpose if you were somehow informing us what we could do to help. Maybe recommending a charity or volunteer effort that your readers could go to and help improve the lives of the most vulnerable.

    Or are you just complaining? Wouldn’t that be a surprise…

    Still I'm glad that you gave the issue a platform in case anyone missed it in the Post.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I was on the jury that convicted Tonya Jenkins and I can tell you that we felt the entire foster care system and CFSA should have been on trial also. I hope the grandmother does sue.
    In addition, I sometime represent Counsel for Child Abuse and Neglect cases (CCAN) and the social workers, even those that try, have too many cases and until the city demands from itself, in the form of more money for the system, cases like these will keep happening.

    ReplyDelete
  27. More money? Come on! We have a stadium to pay for!

    ~Rusty

    Also, PS, sorry for not posting anything new lately. Spent the last two days doing laundry which makes it harder for me to get annoyed by something.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Any city can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable citizens.

    I'm not in the mood to troll through Bartlett's but isn't this a really famous quote from... i want to say... Karl Marx. Something about the measure of a country being in how it treats its animals. Something like that....

    At any rate, you make a good point.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Don't shake the baby, people. Just don't.

    ReplyDelete
  30. For god's sake, fix your RSS feed. Or at least link to it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rusty, go here for easy stats (on many things): www.statemaster.com

    "Your vagina does not give you a monopoly on the abortion debate."

    That's a great line, by the way (and yes, I'm female :)

    ReplyDelete
  32. To Girl who said:

    "Acutally, unborn children ARE NOT the most vulnerable members, as 90 % or more make it out of the womb just fine. It is clear that in DC, an unborn child has a much better odds of surviving than a kid in the foster care system. Half or more of our homeless population was in the systm at some point in their lives, and we can see how far that got them. "

    AMEN! I want to give you a job!

    ReplyDelete